CC'ing Animesh and Alena (since they are the ones offering to be in contact).
Nicolas - keep in mind that they are US West Coast time. And when you say 6PM, which timezone are you in specifically? On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:46:27PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote: > Hi, > is it possible to have a meeting today, May 22 6pm for Europe ? > Guillaume is the privileged interlocutor. > Regards. > > e 21/05/2013 22:20, Chip Childers a écrit : > >Adding Nicolas to the CC line to be sure that he sees Animesh's offer. > > > >Animesh - Nicolas is in the EU, so I'd expect a reply tomorrow? > > > >On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:01:59PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com] > >>>Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:30 AM > >>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >>>Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2 > >>> > >>>Hi > >>>We didn't so much choose the Security Groups feature as we found that the > >>>VLAN option, which is the only other option available in 2.2.13, wouldn't > >>>let > >>>us achieve what we had in mind in terms of Network Architecture. > >>>This was more of a default choice. > >>> > >>>Our need was/is to : > >>>- use external gateways (don't use Virtual Routers as gateways) > >>>- use external firewalls > >>>- have 2 or 3 VLANs, depending on customers' needs, for each "customer > >>>platform". A "customer platform" in our own terminology is mapped to a > >>>Domain and an Account in the CS terminology. Those VLAN are affected > >>>externally by our own tool which call CloudStack and set the appropriate > >>>VLANs in the Networks attached to a domain. > >>>- not have overlapping subnets between customers. We split our subnet > >>>between customers, each has a different one > >>> > >>>And we couldn't have that if we had chosen in our Zone configuration an > >>>Advanced Network with VLAN instead of Security Groups. But we don't use > >>>the Security Groups feature itself. > >>> > >>>Regarding these needs what do you think is the best way for us to upgrade > >>>from 2.2.13 to 4.1 and not break existing customers ? > >>[Animesh>] I am still not following the use-case completely, should we do a > >>go to meeting ? Alena and I can join. Let me know what time works best for > >>you. > > > > > > > -- > Nicolas Lamirault > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete > altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages > that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
