On May 22, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> CC'ing Animesh and Alena (since they are the ones offering to be in > contact). > > Nicolas - keep in mind that they are US West Coast time. And when you > say 6PM, which timezone are you in specifically? Paris time, currently PST +9, 9am for Animesh > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:46:27PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote: >> Hi, >> is it possible to have a meeting today, May 22 6pm for Europe ? >> Guillaume is the privileged interlocutor. >> Regards. >> >> e 21/05/2013 22:20, Chip Childers a écrit : >>> Adding Nicolas to the CC line to be sure that he sees Animesh's offer. >>> >>> Animesh - Nicolas is in the EU, so I'd expect a reply tomorrow? >>> >>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:01:59PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: nicolas.lamira...@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamira...@orange.com] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:30 AM >>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2 >>>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> We didn't so much choose the Security Groups feature as we found that the >>>>> VLAN option, which is the only other option available in 2.2.13, wouldn't >>>>> let >>>>> us achieve what we had in mind in terms of Network Architecture. >>>>> This was more of a default choice. >>>>> >>>>> Our need was/is to : >>>>> - use external gateways (don't use Virtual Routers as gateways) >>>>> - use external firewalls >>>>> - have 2 or 3 VLANs, depending on customers' needs, for each "customer >>>>> platform". A "customer platform" in our own terminology is mapped to a >>>>> Domain and an Account in the CS terminology. Those VLAN are affected >>>>> externally by our own tool which call CloudStack and set the appropriate >>>>> VLANs in the Networks attached to a domain. >>>>> - not have overlapping subnets between customers. We split our subnet >>>>> between customers, each has a different one >>>>> >>>>> And we couldn't have that if we had chosen in our Zone configuration an >>>>> Advanced Network with VLAN instead of Security Groups. But we don't use >>>>> the Security Groups feature itself. >>>>> >>>>> Regarding these needs what do you think is the best way for us to upgrade >>>>> from 2.2.13 to 4.1 and not break existing customers ? >>>> [Animesh>] I am still not following the use-case completely, should we do >>>> a go to meeting ? Alena and I can join. Let me know what time works best >>>> for you. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Nicolas Lamirault >> >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu >> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages >> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete >> altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged >> information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and >> delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages >> that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> >>
