Not that I have heard of. You can at best replace the sec. storage (there is a manual procedure for that), but since generally there is a single sec. storage how can you implement maintenance mode ? Can you please explain is your use case ?
On 30/05/13 7:32 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >LS, > >Has there ever been discussion about implementing maintenance mode for >secondary storage? And are people thinking about this? > >thanks >Daan Hoogland