> On July 26, 2013, 8:46 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
> > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 253
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/2/?file=328044#file328044line253>
> >
> >     I think we already have alike mechanism for executing inside user VM? 
> > Check get_ssh_client. If it doesn't fit, we need some generic mechanism 
> > rather than one method for one test case.
> 
> Ashutosh Kelkar wrote:
>     Yes, that method works when VM is created with mode=advance. Here we 
> don't want to create PF rule and setup public ip for a VM. we just want to 
> test the egress rule and policy. In this case we have to take hopes to 
> Hypervisor Host-> Router-> VM instance to reach out VM for checking the 
> public network access.
>
> 
> Sheng Yang wrote:
>     Got it. But still it should be a good idea to add it to generic mechanism 
> rather than implement it for each test case.

Sure, I will add an enhancement ticket and will update the base.py with 
VirtualMachine.exec_script_on_user_vm(). It will be help full in future test 
case dev.


- Ashutosh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review23920
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 26, 2013, 6:27 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 26, 2013, 6:27 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Jayapal Reddy, and Prasanna 
> Santhanam.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ashutosh Kelkar
> 
>

Reply via email to