Sebastien, Are you thinking november in Amsterdam, or before?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:06 AM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 5:25 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote: > >> As mentioned on private, I think the reason we have so few responders when >> it comes to voting - is because it takes considerable amount of time to >> build, test and QA. And if you take voting serious as everyone should, you >> have to QA before you can vote. >> >> >> >> Perhaps we should spent some time on automation and take an automation step >> further. >> >> >> >> My next dream project is to create a set of 3 virtual appliances. >> >> >> >> Set 1: >> >> 2 KVM Hypervisors preconfigured with NFS >> >> 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code >> >> >> >> Set 2: >> >> 2 XEN Hypervisors preconfigured with NFS >> >> 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code >> >> >> >> Set 3: >> >> 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code >> >> >> >> Set 3 get a bit hairy because of Virtual Center and licensing, so we >> abstract it and let folks QA what they have. >> >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> Do you find this approach useful, or do you believe the build tests we do is >> sufficient? >> >> Who can join or atleast share scripts they use to automate provisioning of >> KVM and XEN hosts? >> >> I'm looking for set of "post" scripts they can configure XEN and KVM end 2 >> end. >> >> Thanks >> ilya > > Ilya, I think this is in-line with what Marcus is proposing. > > In another thread on testing I proposed to have a meeting where anyone > interested in testing can join and where we can hash out a plan, then report > back to the list. > > > > -sebastien
