On Sep 15, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sebastien, > > Are you thinking november in Amsterdam, or before? I was thinking about a conference call - way before Amsterdam- > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:06 AM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Sep 11, 2013, at 5:25 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote: >> >>> As mentioned on private, I think the reason we have so few responders when >>> it comes to voting - is because it takes considerable amount of time to >>> build, test and QA. And if you take voting serious as everyone should, you >>> have to QA before you can vote. >>> >>> >>> >>> Perhaps we should spent some time on automation and take an automation step >>> further. >>> >>> >>> >>> My next dream project is to create a set of 3 virtual appliances. >>> >>> >>> >>> Set 1: >>> >>> 2 KVM Hypervisors preconfigured with NFS >>> >>> 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code >>> >>> >>> >>> Set 2: >>> >>> 2 XEN Hypervisors preconfigured with NFS >>> >>> 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code >>> >>> >>> >>> Set 3: >>> >>> 1 CloudStack MS with latest RC code >>> >>> >>> >>> Set 3 get a bit hairy because of Virtual Center and licensing, so we >>> abstract it and let folks QA what they have. >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Do you find this approach useful, or do you believe the build tests we do >>> is sufficient? >>> >>> Who can join or atleast share scripts they use to automate provisioning of >>> KVM and XEN hosts? >>> >>> I'm looking for set of "post" scripts they can configure XEN and KVM end 2 >>> end. >>> >>> Thanks >>> ilya >> >> Ilya, I think this is in-line with what Marcus is proposing. >> >> In another thread on testing I proposed to have a meeting where anyone >> interested in testing can join and where we can hash out a plan, then report >> back to the list. >> >> >> >> -sebastien
