Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm as not running:
INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking CIDR... INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60 INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host 10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host 10.200.23.42 is already setup. INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) Received a host startup notification INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334 INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) Received a host startup notification INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking CIDR... INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60 INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host 10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host 10.200.23.41 is already setup. INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) Connection established between org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2 host + 1 INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) Received a host startup notification INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080 INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) Received a host startup notification INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) Connection established between org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a host + 2 INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk? regards, Daan On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the > computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this > message while the ssvm was up. > > once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: >> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in >> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you encountered >> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is in >> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We may >> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case. >> >> Thanks >> -min >> >> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to >>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called >>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some >>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the >>>first thing stopping me usually. >>> >>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM >>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called >>>>> >>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it >>>>>seems >>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems >>>>>bad. I >>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like "Unable >>>>>to >>>>> create local folder for: >>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to mount >>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger problem >>>>>is, >>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup it >>>>>should >>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped >>>>>that is >>>>> enabling that? >>>> >>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then >>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download >>>>template. >>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount >>>>>secondary to >>>>> the management server if the conditions are right... >>>>> >>>>> Darren >>
