Can you file a bug and attach your db dump and ms log with it? Thanks -min
On 9/27/13 3:14 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it >was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm >as not running: > >INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking >CIDR... >INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60 >INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host >10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host >10.200.23.42 is already setup. >INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >Received a host startup notification >INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334 >INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >Received a host startup notification >INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking >CIDR... >INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60 >INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host >10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host >10.200.23.41 is already setup. >INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >Connection established between >org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2 >host + 1 >INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >Received a host startup notification >INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080 >INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >Received a host startup notification >INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >Connection established between >org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a >host + 2 >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint > >is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk? > >regards, >Daan > >On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the >> computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this >> message while the ssvm was up. >> >> once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks >> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in >>> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you >>>encountered >>> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is >>>in >>> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We >>>may >>> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -min >>> >>> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to >>>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called >>>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some >>>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the >>>>first thing stopping me usually. >>>> >>>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> >>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM >>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called >>>>>> >>>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it >>>>>>seems >>>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems >>>>>>bad. I >>>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like >>>>>>"Unable >>>>>>to >>>>>> create local folder for: >>>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to >>>>>>mount >>>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger >>>>>>problem >>>>>>is, >>>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup >>>>>>it >>>>>>should >>>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped >>>>>>that is >>>>>> enabling that? >>>>> >>>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then >>>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download >>>>>template. >>>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount >>>>>>secondary to >>>>>> the management server if the conditions are right... >>>>>> >>>>>> Darren >>>
