H Min I made a bug and attached the log. If you don't see it at the spot don't worry. when prio gets high I'll look at it myself. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: > Can you file a bug and attach your db dump and ms log with it? > > Thanks > -min > > On 9/27/13 3:14 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it >>was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm >>as not running: >> >>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >>Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking >>CIDR... >>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >>StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60 >>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host >>10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host >>10.200.23.42 is already setup. >>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >>Received a host startup notification >>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334 >>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >>Received a host startup notification >>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >>Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking >>CIDR... >>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >>StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60 >>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host >>10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host >>10.200.23.41 is already setup. >>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a) >>Connection established between >>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2 >>host + 1 >>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >>Received a host startup notification >>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080 >>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >>Received a host startup notification >>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637) >>Connection established between >>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a >>host + 2 >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No >>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint >> >>is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk? >> >>regards, >>Daan >> >>On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >>> The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the >>> computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this >>> message while the ssvm was up. >>> >>> once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in >>>> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you >>>>encountered >>>> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is >>>>in >>>> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We >>>>may >>>> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -min >>>> >>>> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to >>>>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called >>>>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some >>>>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the >>>>>first thing stopping me usually. >>>>> >>>>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <edison...@citrix.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com] >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM >>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it >>>>>>>seems >>>>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems >>>>>>>bad. I >>>>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like >>>>>>>"Unable >>>>>>>to >>>>>>> create local folder for: >>>>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to >>>>>>>mount >>>>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger >>>>>>>problem >>>>>>>is, >>>>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup >>>>>>>it >>>>>>>should >>>>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped >>>>>>>that is >>>>>>> enabling that? >>>>>> >>>>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then >>>>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download >>>>>>template. >>>>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount >>>>>>>secondary to >>>>>>> the management server if the conditions are right... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Darren >>>> >
