Seems Marvin won't depend on commands.xml any more, thus won't depend on any 
artifacts build from cloudstack. So I am +1.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 10:14 AM
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack
> 
> I would like to seperate marvin from the main cloudstack repo. Much of
> marvin's development has little coupling with CloudStack.
> 
> Similar to CloudMonkey, marvin undergoes rapid changes and it is essential
> to provide a smooth workflow and faster releases for those working with it.
> 
> There are also a small set of people currently looking at marvin for testing
> right now. Often, their reviews and QA effort is mixed with those of
> cloudstack itself. By having a different repo I'd like to be able to provide
> commit access to those working on marvin alone quickly to help with testing.
> 
> After separating marvin
> 0. we will have a separate release cycle for marvin 1. we will have a new
> home for marvin's docs using Sphinx 2. if possible, a different criteria for
> providing commit access to marvin's repos.
> 3. all tests of cloudstack will also move to marvin's repository
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> --
> Prasanna.,
> 
> ------------------------
> Powered by BigRock.com

Reply via email to