Okay, going to try this again; I have 18 public facing IPs and endless
subnets on the private side, so i would assume this would be the same
thing as you mentioned without an issue. As i've done this before,
without issue; I just cannot figure out what the hell I am doing wrong.
- Maurice
On 1/24/14, 3:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
They don't technically need ips just for VM traffic, it totally
depends on your setup. You need to decide where your management
network is connected and add the ip there, whether it's cloubr0,
cloudbr1, or some other interface.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Maurice Lawler <maur...@daoenix.com> wrote:
The document states, create cloudbr0 and cloudbr1 without IPs, I did as it
told me which didn't seem right to begin with.
DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:04:xx:xx:xx:xx
ONBOOT=yes
HOTPLUG=no
BOOTPROTO=none
TYPE=Ethernet
DEVICE=cloudbr0
TYPE=Bridge
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
IPV6INIT=no
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
DELAY=5
STP=yes
DEVICE=cloudbr1
TYPE=Bridge
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
IPV6INIT=no
IPV6_AUTOCONF=no
DELAY=5
STP=yes
On 1/24/14, 3:23 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
so...
eth0 -> cloudbr0 ? And that's the management interface? If so, where is
the ip for the server? I don't see any ip on cloudbr0, that might be why you
have no access.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Maurice Lawler <maur...@daoenix.com
<mailto:maur...@daoenix.com>> wrote:
Marcus,
So I have gone through the docs and set it up as discussed. I am
now unable to gain access to the server:
The screen shot I have here:
That shows you cloud0 which was setup automatically, cloudbr0 and
cloudbr1 which I setup both, of course both without IP address, as
it states to do in the docs. Along with that, I have eth0 setup as
bridge, eth0.100 - eth0.300 setup according to the docs. The
eth0.100 has the public facing IP address, however, my connection
times out; I saw other examples where the public IP address was
attached to cloudbr0, can you please tell me what I am missing?
- Maurice
On 1/24/14, 12:04 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I've always setup cloudbr0 (pub/mgt/guest br) per the documented
examples,
and never cloud0 (link local bridge). You can look at the
devcloud-kvm doc
for an example of an all-in-one. The traffic labels reference
bridges, so
you have to have a bridge to enter as a traffic label in the first
place.
If you don't provide traffic labels, it by default looks for cloudbr0
for
public and cloudbr1 for guest and private.
Looking through the code, it looks as though if you stick with an
'untagged' public network (enter no vlan id in your public range),
then
you're required to create the bridge yourself, matcing the traffic
label
you enter. If you enter a vlan id, then it will create the public
bridge
for you, but you still have to identify where you want the bridge to
be
created via traffic label. e.g. say you have only cloudbr0, which is
your
mgmt bridge, and you want vlan 460 on that same eth device to be
public
traffic. You'd enter 460 as the vlan id when entering the public
traffic
range, and set the traffic label to 'cloudbr0', to identify where the
vlan
460 bridge should be created. it then looks up the physical interface
that
cloudbr0 is bridged to (eth0), creates a tagged interface (eth0.460),
and a
bridge (breth0-460).
For private traffic (mgmt), it expects you to have already created
the
bridge. I believe this is most likely because they expect this to be
how
you're reaching the server in the first place (via ssh on mgmt net).
Guest
networks are always dynamically created.
On Jan 23, 2014 9:11 PM, "Maurice Lawler"<maur...@daoenix.com>
<mailto:maur...@daoenix.com> wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up KVM / Cloudstack all under one server. I have done
this
countless of other times, however, this time on a new server I have
noticed
it did not provision cloudbr0 / cloud0 as it has done in the past.
I saw a few tutorials where it says to setup VLANS
ifcfg-eth0.100-300
which I understand. However, right now I am not sure if this is the
normal
for 4.2 to not have those two previously mentioned interfaces
already setup
when you issue the command setup-management / setup-databases as it
has
done before.
Can someone explain this to me?
- Maurice
