Hi, On 11/25/2014 12:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi, > > During CCCEU14 conference and over emails, I spoke with many CloudStack users > and I think most of us would like to have and use LTS releases. I propose > that; > > - We encourage a habit to backport a bugfix to all qualifying branches > whether or not those branches are LTS > - We contribute (unit, integration) tests on LTS branches as well on other > qualifying branches > - We put correct affect version and fix version on JIRA so issues that should > be backported to a branch are identified > - We adapt the LTS release model from Fedora/Ubuntu projects. Please share > ideas, comments? > - We officially recognize a LTS release branch, say 4.3 now and everyone > helps to maintain it, backport bugfixes etc. > - Until a next latest stable release is published that we all mutually agree, > we keep working on the LTS branch. After say we have a stable 4.5.0 or 4.5.1 > release, we can agree to recognize 4.5 as our next LTS branch and work on it. > > Having a robust product release means we all (developers, users, sysadmins, > ops etc.) can save time consumed on firefighting a CloudStack cloud. Having a > LTS branch and releases will get us there because on a LTS release/support > branch we don’t do feature work at all and we only invest time to do > bugfixing etc. > > ShapeBlue is already serving their customers with product patching service > and using our own packages hosting (http://shapeblue.com/packages) we publish > patches on the “main” repository for everyone. We also publish details of the > patch we publish on our Github wiki, such as this example; > https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/wiki/Release-Notes:-ACS-4.4.1-ShapeBlue-Patch01 > We’ve recently started putting patches and release notes publicly (rather > than just using emails) so you’ll see more of these in future. When we make > patches we push the changes to upstream branches as well, in fact we fix on > upstream first. > > In our experience the 4.3.x releases are most stable and so we’re backporting > bugfixes from 4.4/4.5/master. I’m personally going through a list of JIRA > issues which has affect version 4.3.0 and/or 4.3.1 but the bugfix either does > not exist or exists in a non-4.3 branch. >
I'm not against it at all, I think that a lot of end-users would really want this. But aren't we a bit to soon? I agree that 4.3 is a good version which is out there and 4.4.2 seems to be as well, but where do we make the decision? I think that we should have master more stable before we can do this. Backporting things from master to 4.3 is already a time consuming job due to the big differences between the branches. At PCextreme we run on 4.3 with our own homebrew version where we got some patches from master to 4.3, but that is already taking a lot of time. Wido > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > Software Architect, ShapeBlue > M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab > > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services > > IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > CloudStack Software > Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > CloudStack Infrastructure > Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training > Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon > its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you > believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company > incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company > incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. > Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is > operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company > registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from > Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >
