If a storage pool is put in disabled state then it will not be picked up as a 
possible destination when a volume is being migrated or when a virtual machine 
is being migrated along with its volumes.

Regards,
Devdeep

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 7:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Disable primary storage, not delete...
> 
> Yeah, probably option 2 is better.
> 
> I would think you couldn't use this primary storage as the target of a
> migration or for HA.
> 
> On Monday, February 23, 2015, Harikrishna Patnala <
> harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think it is better to go with option 2, as it makes sense to be part
> > of one of the states.
> >
> > I believe that VMs using that storage continue to work, but what are
> > the plans for the operations related to the storage on those VMs like
> > migration/HA/... ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harikrishna
> >
> > On 23-Feb-2015, at 3:01 pm, Devdeep Singh <devdeep.si...@citrix.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was looking into implementing the ability to disable a storage
> > > pool
> > for provisioning. I could think of two ways to do it
> > >
> > > 1. CloudStack admin could add a 'disabled' tag on the storage pool.
> > > The
> > storage pool allocators would skip the pools for allocating volumes
> > with the 'disabled' tag.
> > > 2. Other option would be to add 'Disabled' as one of the states of
> > storage pool. This could be a state in addition to "Up", "Maintenance" etc.
> > A storage pool in "Disabled" state will not be picked up for
> > provisioning volumes. This would require new apis for disabling/enabling
> storage pool.
> > >
> > > Thoughts, comments?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Devdeep
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > <javascript:;>]
> > >> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:48 AM
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;>
> > >> Subject: Re: Disable primary storage, not delete...
> > >>
> > >> For my suggestion to work, though, your compute and disk offerings
> > >> have
> > to
> > >> be set up currently to make use of one or more storage tags.
> > >>
> > >> The idea is then that these offerings would require your primary
> > storage to
> > >> have a given tag or tags and it never will (effectively disabling
> > >> that
> > primary
> > >> storage from being used with your offerings).
> > >>
> > >> On Sunday, February 22, 2015, Mike Tutkowski
> > >> <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> What about changing the storage tags field of your primary storage
> > >>> so it doesn't serve as a match for any compute or disk offering?
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sunday, February 22, 2015, Andrija Panic
> > >>> <andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>
> > >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','andrija.pa...@gmail.com
> > >>> <javascript:;>');>>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I was wondering is it safe to change the Cluster Wide primary
> > >>>> storage to a Zone Wide primary storage (change the database,
> > >>>> cloud.storage_pool). This is ACS 4.3.0
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Or actually better question - since I have some old NFS servers
> > >>>> exist as Primary Storage - is there any way to exclude this NFS
> > >>>> (Cluster
> > >>>> Wide)  - or disable it, so the new Volume Uploads will not use
> > >>>> that NFS storage...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This is some trail from the history, that I can't really delete,
> > >>>> but would like to completely disable further usage of this NFS 
> > >>>> server...
> > >>>> if possible at all...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> THanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Andrija Panić
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > >>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > >>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>
> > >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > <javascript:;>');>
> > >>> o: 303.746.7302
> > >>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > >>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> > >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>
> > >> o: 303.746.7302
> > >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > >> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
> >
> >
> 
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*

Reply via email to