Hey Daan,
I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb packaging issues for 4.4
Have a look here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/339
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me.
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > If no objections I will reset the default to 4.4.1 (the lowest required
> > version) include Rafaels pr for kvm/centos packaging and create a new rc.
> >
> > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:54 schreef Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
> > >:
> >
> > > So we will have to include an update in every release and we will
> > probably
> > > forget about that pretty soon.
> > >
> > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:49 schreef Remi Bergsma <r...@remi.nl>:
> > >
> > >> I'd say, as a default: 4.4.0 will be nice for any 4.4.x release, and
> > 4.5.0
> > >> for 4.5.x etc. This is also close to what was hard-coded before.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Remi
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2015-06-01 11:33 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >> > Guess we'll be making a new rc. The value can be 0.0.0 for my part,
> it
> > >> must
> > >> > be an operator decision to set the MinVRVersion if it must be
> higher.
> > It
> > >> > will always be an upgrade matter and any seeded template should be
> > >> accepted
> > >> > as per the installation notes. Of course the other side of the issue
> > is
> > >> > whether a version will work at all. The operator can create a
> version
> > of
> > >> > the template with their own versioning scheme, however. I should be
> > >> writing
> > >> > all this in another {DISCUSS]-thread.
> > >> >
> > >> > cancelling the RC to add code for Bruno's requirement.
> > >> >
> > >> > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 08:35 schreef Milamber <milam...@apache.org>:
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please note: I my case, there isn't an upgrade, I have the issue
> > with
> > >> > > 4.4.3 or 4.4.4 fresh installation (out of the box, from git tag
> > >> > > 4.4-RC20150529T2004)
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 01/06/2015 07:22, Erik Weber wrote:
> > >> > > > If it means that all upgrades are unable to do VR related tasks
> (
> > >> > > starting
> > >> > > > VMs for one.. ), I'd call that regression and redo.
> > >> > > > Relying on all our users to do manual fixing just because we
> don't
> > >> want
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > call off the RC is bad IMHO.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
