Do we have travis jobs to test packaging? -- Erik
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > I noticed, will look at travis and merge > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 14:27 schreef Rafael Fonseca <rsafons...@gmail.com>: > > > Hey Daan, > > I've also created a PR for fixing a couple of deb packaging issues for > 4.4 > > Have a look here: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/339 > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Sounds reasonable to me. > > > > > > -- > > > Erik > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > If no objections I will reset the default to 4.4.1 (the lowest > required > > > > version) include Rafaels pr for kvm/centos packaging and create a new > > rc. > > > > > > > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:54 schreef Daan Hoogland < > > > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > So we will have to include an update in every release and we will > > > > probably > > > > > forget about that pretty soon. > > > > > > > > > > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 11:49 schreef Remi Bergsma <r...@remi.nl>: > > > > > > > > > >> I'd say, as a default: 4.4.0 will be nice for any 4.4.x release, > and > > > > 4.5.0 > > > > >> for 4.5.x etc. This is also close to what was hard-coded before. > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Remi > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> 2015-06-01 11:33 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > >: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Guess we'll be making a new rc. The value can be 0.0.0 for my > > part, > > > it > > > > >> must > > > > >> > be an operator decision to set the MinVRVersion if it must be > > > higher. > > > > It > > > > >> > will always be an upgrade matter and any seeded template should > be > > > > >> accepted > > > > >> > as per the installation notes. Of course the other side of the > > issue > > > > is > > > > >> > whether a version will work at all. The operator can create a > > > version > > > > of > > > > >> > the template with their own versioning scheme, however. I should > > be > > > > >> writing > > > > >> > all this in another {DISCUSS]-thread. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > cancelling the RC to add code for Bruno's requirement. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Op ma 1 jun. 2015 om 08:35 schreef Milamber < > milam...@apache.org > > >: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Please note: I my case, there isn't an upgrade, I have the > issue > > > > with > > > > >> > > 4.4.3 or 4.4.4 fresh installation (out of the box, from git > tag > > > > >> > > 4.4-RC20150529T2004) > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > On 01/06/2015 07:22, Erik Weber wrote: > > > > >> > > > If it means that all upgrades are unable to do VR related > > tasks > > > ( > > > > >> > > starting > > > > >> > > > VMs for one.. ), I'd call that regression and redo. > > > > >> > > > Relying on all our users to do manual fixing just because we > > > don't > > > > >> want > > > > >> > > to > > > > >> > > > call off the RC is bad IMHO. > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
