Kris,
With on-going PR review/merging, it is requested to engage in those PRs and fix merge conflicts that may happen again as other PRs merge. I would also like to encourage you and other Nuage folks to review other PRs and engage on outstanding review comments and questions. - Rohit ________________________________ From: Kris Sterckx <kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 2:45:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: 4.11 : Physical networking migration ; Config Drive support Also, both PRs have been (re)rebased today : Network migration : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2259 Config Drive : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2097 Hope to make these happen. Thanks, Kris On 19 December 2017 at 15:44, Kris Sterckx <kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote: > Hi Wido. > > sorry for late reply. Thanks, that sounds great. > > Yes we can move from SS to PS if we accept that once 4.12 is deployed with > updated code, in order to migrate a particular's VM iso, the VM needs to be > stopped & restarted. Then the iso will be recreated. > > My suggestion would be merging in Config drive support and declare as > experimental in 4.11 , then people (ops and devs) can use it for > experimental use and give feedback and we can further harden it in 4.12 and > declare it as GA. > I think any other way won't work. > > Let me know your view. > > Thanks, Kris > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue > On 14 December 2017 at 09:59, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > >> >> >> On 12/07/2017 03:17 PM, Kris Sterckx wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> >>> I would like to raise attention to 2 features which are pending 4.11, >>> which >>> received great appreciation from some of you and which from Nuage >>> perspective we see great interest to from large operators also. They are >>> : >>> >>> - Physical networking migration, or : Migrate networks to a new >>> physical >>> network >>> Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10024 >>> Design doc : >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Physi >>> cal+Networking+Migration >>> PR : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2259 >>> - Config Drive support : >>> >>> Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9813 >>> Design doc : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9813 >>> PR : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2097 >>> >>> >>> I would like to emphasis first that both features are generic solutions, >>> not tight to any SDN solution whatsoever. >>> >>> >>> Regarding network migration support : to anyone interested in this >>> capability, please review the design doc and/or the PR. The more buy-in >>> we >>> get to this large amount of work we spent to this, the more appraisal you >>> give to the guys who spent the work. We hope to get this PR merged in >>> before end of the year. >>> >>> >>> Regarding config drive support : as already discussed in the Miami >>> Collaboration conference in May, this PR gives you fully standard >>> cloud-init support using the OpenStack configdrive datasource provider >>> and >>> it works like a charm. We received very positive feedback to this. There >>> has been discussion about the storage strategy though and people voted >>> for >>> storing the iso's at primary storage rather than at secondary storage. >>> There has been further work spent on this by Frank Maximus and there has >>> been some review of that but i am not sure we still want to include that >>> change still in 4.11. Frankly my proposal would be we take an incremental >>> approach and start larger validation cycles for the outstanding PR and >>> approach further evolution of it in the next release cycle. Open to your >>> feedback. In any case I would find it a missed opportunity if config >>> drive >>> would eventually not find its way into 4.11 at all. Again, we see great >>> interest in this. Potentially we could declare it as experimental >>> support, >>> to be enabled via an advanced setting - just an idea. In that way more >>> people get can a sense of how it works and provide feedback. Another item >>> to notice is that as Nuage team does not have XenServer deployments, we >>> have no facility to verify the PR with XenServer. Helping out on that >>> would >>> be appreciated also. >>> >>> >> We could do it in two steps indeed. Move to PS in a later stage (if >> that's doable?). >> >> I would love to take a look at this as I'd love to see this feature in >> 4.11, but I'm very low on time to actually look at it. >> >> Wido >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> Kris >>> >>> >
