Make sense for the proposed implementation, would it handle redundant master? How would the k8s cluster would be created, using Rancher tools, kubectl or other?
so far, the small part I understand from MaaS, it could be very interesting to integrate it to cloudstack in a way where it could be use to scale Hypervisor host, specially KVM nodes. On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:47 AM Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > The proposed implementation will create a master and n worker nodes. > It will also support (graceful) cluster resizing, the next step would be > to enable the CloudStack plugin for Kubernetes to allow Kubernetes to drive > that scaling, so that you can scale with demand rather than needing to > oversize you environment to begin with. > > I've been keeping MaaS in mind as way of doing baremetal Kubernetes along > side VM based Kubernetes clusters. Interestingly a few people that I have > spoken to have said that they prefer the use of VMs, because whole servers > as the unit of scale is often very wasteful, unless you 'share' them which > has all sorts of security implications... > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloud.ca> > Sent: 25 September 2019 15:31 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Service plugin > > Hi Paul, > > Yeah, was bad timing for the CCCNA this year unfortunately :-(, I'm not > sure I'm curious to see how cloudstack could become more "other Apache > products friendly" but I don't have particular use case compared to k8s > integration. Has you are suggesting, would probably make sense to use Helm > to deploy any other application stack. > > btw, we are still working on the Canonical MaaS integration, a bit more > challenging than anticipated... > > > To get back to a *Kubernetes Service plugin*: > To me, as a user of cloudstack at the moment, If I deploy a k8s cluster, I > need to deploy monstrous instances for worker nodes. > which doesn't make sense if I'm a cloud consumer. So I think we need to > solve something challenging: a k8s service that would scale has needed > while keeping in mind redundancy of worker nodes without sacrifice on > security. Is the worker node is part of the ongoing work or it's more about > offering a k8s master and api infrastructure to a user ? > > An easy path would be some kind of shared worker nodes pool but that > involve possible security risk unless you would trust users that consume > those workers. > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:15 AM Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Pierre-Luc, > > > > (we missed you at CCCNA!) How are you seeing CloudStack being more > > deployment friendly? What you do think that we could do on top of > > creating the Kubenetes Cluster to begin with? > > [thinking out loud - we could pre-package Tiller to make it easier to > > deploy openWhisk via Helm charts ? ] > > > > Kind regards > > > > > > Paul. > > > > > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > > www.shapeblue.com > > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloud.ca> > > Sent: 25 September 2019 13:37 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Kubernetes Service plugin > > > > Hi Rohit, Nux, > > > > Thanks Rohit for cloudstack-provider, that's exactly it ! :-D Nux, I > agree > > with your opinion, but there is a lot of interest for k8s and seams like > a > > lot of organisations are moving to container based infrastructures to > > standardized their deployment. > > > > if we want to extent the discussion to function as a service, would you > > guys see a possibility for us to be more aligned or more deployment > > friendly for Openwhisk ? > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 6:54 AM Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > > wrote: > > > > > We see huge demand for K8s in our customer base. Just a note... > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019, 4:03 AM Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > > > > > > > Do you guys see high demand for K8s? > > > > From where I'm looking it seems to be going the way of Openstack, > > > > loads of hype, overcomplicated, near-impossible to upgrade. > > > > Not sure if it's worth investing resources for this. > > > > > > > > Lucian > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > > > > > On 2019-09-24 07:41, Abhishek Kumar wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to propose developing a plugin for Kubernetes > > > > > integration in CloudStack, can be named CloudStack Kubernetes > > Service plugin. > > > > > I've written down an initial design document for it here, > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Kube > > > rnetes+Service > > > > > Please review and provide your thoughts and suggestions. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Abhishek Kumar > > > > > > > > > > Software Engineer > > > > > > > > > > ShapeBlue > > > > > > > > > > abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com > > > > > > > > > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > > > > > > > > > abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com > > > > > www.shapeblue.com > > > > > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Pierre-Luc Dion*Lead Cloud Architect | Architecte infonuagique principal > > t 1.888.796.8364 ext. 1403 > > > > > > < > > > https://cloud.ca/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloud-ca-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email > > > > > > > > -- > -- *Pierre-Luc Dion*Lead Cloud Architect | Architecte infonuagique principal t 1.888.796.8364 ext. 1403 <https://cloud.ca/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=signature&utm_content=cloud-ca-logo-1&utm_campaign=general_email>
