Hi Sina, First. Cool feature!
Agree with Daan. This would be absolutely nice to have the possibility to send the log files to separate log server. So in the end of the day we have an Heavy management server. Cheers Sven __ Sven Vogel Lead Cloud Solution Architect EWERK DIGITAL GmbH Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig P +49 341 42649 - 99 F +49 341 42649 - 98 s.vo...@ewerk.com www.ewerk.com Geschäftsführer: Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Tassilo Möschke Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 9065 Zertifiziert nach: ISO/IEC 27001:2013 DIN EN ISO 9001:2015 DIN ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 EWERK-Blog | LinkedIn | Xing | Twitter | Facebook Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich. Disclaimer Privacy: Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) ist vertraulich und nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen Sie die E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. Vielen Dank. The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you. > Am 27.05.2020 um 17:43 schrieb Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > great initiative Sina, I did leave a comment on the PR, about > configurability. > in short two worries: > 1. an operator uses a different log host than the MS (i.e an ip/hostname > config) > 2. an operator wants to not use the feature (i.e. a boolean flag) > I'm not sure how much this would require, but it seems minimal. Of course, > not opening the port is blocking the feature as well. > > >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:55 PM Sina Kashipazha >> <esterlin...@yahoo.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> Centralised logging capability. >> >> Our improvements to systemvm allow Cloudstack administrator to access >> systemvms logs inside the management server. It removes the difficulty of >> downloading logs from systemvms. They are forwarded to the management >> server automatically, and administrators can access them in >> "/var/log/rsyslog/%HOSTNAME%/syslog”. >> >> >> It doesn’t require additional work, rsyslog setups on Cloudstack already. >> The only thing we have to do is open rsyslog port to receive these logs and >> tell hypervisors and systemvms to forward them to the management server. >> >> Any comments would be highly appreciated. >> >> For more information take a look at below issue and pull request: >> Issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4093 >> Pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4108 < >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4108> >> >> Kind Regards, >> Sina > > > > -- > Daan
