Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >I just want to collect opinions how to manage the final release. > > > >Now, it seems 2.1rc1 is relative stable, no real complains, some minor > >issues but no showstoppers. > > > > I know of two bugs ATM which are kind of bugging me: > 1) broken tutorial due to missing support of action sets > 2) broken views wrt to resources (see "Re: Treeprocessor bug with > map:resource and views?") > Ok.
> > How's your portal going? I seen that the doc has lots of place holders. > It's going pretty well...it's usable and stable but far from being finished. And it will take some time to complete the docs. > > >..changing readme > >..asking users for testing (which was a success for 2.0.3 and 2.0.4) > > > > .. finish samples refactoring / cleanup > .. fix some more bugs from bugzilla > > > >etc. > > > >Whatever we do, I think a timeframe of two weeks is good, so I suggest > >a final release on tuesday, 12th. > > > > I would opt for 3 weeks but 2 is good enough too. > 3 weeks wouldn't be a problem, either. Carsten
