From: Stefano Mazzocchi > On Tuesday, Sep 23, 2003, at 22:38 Europe/Rome, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > > I would highly recommend steering away from the use of the word > > certified > > unless you intend to establish a standards body to oversee > an official > > certification process. > > Good point. "Supported" sounds less marketing intrusive. > > comments?
What happens if we find out that a certain block is not supported any more (technology outdated, we have a better block, any active developers) *after* we marked it as supported. The first question I had was "how long does supported mean"? The former proposed *certified* relates to a certain point of time without saying something about the future. Another point is that Cocoon is open source and nobody can be forced to support a single line of code ... Maybe we can find a word that relates to a point of time and does not have all the meanings "certified" has (see Berin's mail http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106434951718170&w=2) Reinhard
