From: Stefano Mazzocchi > On Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003, at 17:29 Europe/Rome, Reinhard > Poetz wrote: > > > > > From: Stefano Mazzocchi > > > >> On Tuesday, Sep 23, 2003, at 22:38 Europe/Rome, Berin > Loritsch wrote: > >> > >>> I would highly recommend steering away from the use of the word > >>> certified unless you intend to establish a standards body > to oversee > >> an official > >>> certification process. > >> > >> Good point. "Supported" sounds less marketing intrusive. > >> > >> comments? > > > > What happens if we find out that a certain block is not > supported any > > more (technology outdated, we have a better block, any active > > developers) *after* we marked it as supported. The first question I > > had was "how long does supported mean"? The former proposed > > *certified* relates to a certain point of time without saying > > something about the future. > > > > Another point is that Cocoon is open source and nobody can > be forced > > to support a single line of code ... > > > > Maybe we can find a word that relates to a point of time > and does not > > have all the meanings "certified" has (see Berin's mail > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106434951718170&w=2) > > official?
+1 Reinhard
