Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > > we need the 2.1 repository to be able to do 2.1.x releases. > > Otherwise > > > we would ship alpha code and I think people building their > > > applications upon 2.1 wouldn't be very happy with this. > > > > That's one reason why CVS has branches. > > a new branch or a new repository? IIRC we decided *not* to create any > branches but to create new repositories instead. >
PLEASE, don't start this discussion over and over again. We have (after a long painful discussion period) decided (or better reassured) that we create a new repository for 2.2. And Stefano wanted to contact infrastructure to create the 2.2 one. Carsten
