From: Carsten Ziegeler > > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > > > we need the 2.1 repository to be able to do 2.1.x releases. > > > Otherwise > > > > we would ship alpha code and I think people building their > > > > applications upon 2.1 wouldn't be very happy with this. > > > > > > That's one reason why CVS has branches. > > > > a new branch or a new repository? IIRC we decided *not* to > create any > > branches but to create new repositories instead. > > > > PLEASE, don't start this discussion over and over again. We > have (after > a long painful discussion period) decided (or better reassured) that > we create a new repository for 2.2. And Stefano wanted to contact > infrastructure to create the 2.2 one.
I hope my comment wasn't misleading. I support fully the community decision to create new repositories instead of branches and I'm not interested in leading this discussion again and again. Reinhard
