Tony Collen dijo: > Ugo Cei wrote: >> Leszek Gawron wrote: >> >>> I'm not advising that also. I am talking about providing an easy >>> framework for >>> database operations that would be available from flow. >> > > I had thought about this for a while... a lightweight JDBC wrapper for the > Flow. > > Then I thought about it more... although it might encourage people to > start writing more things in > Flowscript, I think the Correct Way(tm) would be to write your business > logic in a real Java class > and access it from the Flow that way. > > Remember, the Flow is just for controlling the application. I suppose > then the question is, what > happens when your logic depends on something in a database?
+1 Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
