> -----Original Message----- > From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: woensdag 3 december 2003 14:13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: cvs commit: > cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/slide/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/ > source/impl SlideSourceFactory.java > > On 03.12.2003 13:54, Unico Hommes wrote: > > >>I am thinking JDO. What's the reason for this? > > > > Never mind I found it. This one seems unavoidable. Still I > don't like > > the fact that it is excluded by default. It means that I > need to edit > > the blocks.properties in order to include ojb block. I > think we need a > > way to overide excludes (by explicit includes in > > local.blocks.properties) > > > > WDYT? > > I'm not that familiar with Java or the Avalon lifecycles, but > here is my analysis from > http://wiki.cocoondev.org/Wiki.jsp?page=FirstFridayDecember2003: > > Make it possible to include also the OJB block by default > without breaking Cocoon. This is a really important issue as > it breaks our suggested build system workflow using > local.blocks.properties! You can not include blocks when they > are excluded in blocks.properties. > > AFAIU the reason for the problem is factory = new > OjbStorePMF(); in the > initialize() method in JdoPMFImpl.java. Isn't it possible to > do lazy initializing when accessing factory the first time? I > guess this has to be done in getPersistenceManager(). >
Yes, you are right. I got it working now. I had to change the factory instance variable's type to Object but it works. I hope this will also work for other JVM's than the one I tested it on. Should I commit it? Unico
