Sylvain Wallez dijo: > Tim Larson wrote: >>On a related topic, other than because of history, why is "required" >>an attribute of the widget rather than an attribute of the validation >>element? Conceptually, "required" is part of a form's validation logic.
> True. But being required produces a distinguishing display that is not > possible if only represented by a validator. I would add: We can note 2 levels of validations: form level and widget level. > I guess it's the reason. Maybe Bruno could tell us more about this. Yes. The required is also an "attribute" (in OO meaning) of a widget. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
