Sylvain Wallez dijo: > Olivier Billard wrote: > >> Thanks for your answer Sylvain, >> >> A boolean condition on the assert validator instead of a range >> validator suits me well, but to play the devil's advocate ;), what >> about more complex validations, such email ? No way for the moment ? >> It would be very interesting ! > > > <mode type="random-thoughts"> > What about nested validators? Child validators would be checked only > if the parent succeds. > </mode>
<xsl:parse-mode type="random-thoughts"> :-D Nested validator sounds good to me. In some models "nested" validators means: "logic AND", while no nested means logical OR. </mode> WDYT? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
