Vadim Gritsenko dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: > >>Sylvain Wallez dijo: >> >> >>>Tim Larson wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On a related topic, other than because of history, why is "required" >>>>an attribute of the widget rather than an attribute of the validation >>>>element? Conceptually, "required" is part of a form's validation >>>> logic. >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >>>True. But being required produces a distinguishing display that is not >>>possible if only represented by a validator. >>> >>> >> >>I would add: >> >>We can note 2 levels of validations: form level and widget level. > > Actually, this is even better idea. Can we have form level validators?
Yes, already have one. See: http://archives.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2004-January/025750.html Errata: Line: "function ValidarCrearPlan(form) {" must be read "function ValidarCreatePlan(form) {" > > > PS Antonio, can you attach not a Javascript, but custom Java validator > to the form? I think this is posible, by calling a java function inside of a javascript function. I don't tested the "direct" plug of a Java function as you suggested, but assuming how javascript "call" the function, I don't see nothing that would prevent to call a direct java code. Anyway this is an interesting test to be done. :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo > > Vadim > >
