Reinhard Poetz dijo: > Since Cocoon supports continuations they seem to attract more and more > interest in the web development world ;-)
This is great! This means Cocoon is the leader in webapp development! :-DD > Anyway, for me only **Java** Flowscript would really make sense because > this would safe the two (technical) arguments against JavaScript flow: > Java is type safe and it is compiled. So you can catch (some) errors at > compile time and not at run time. But it can be abused too. This is one of the "plus" we found a year ago. <comment> AFAIK, the initial wisdom started with scheme, then we switched to javascript (thanks to Christian Oliver). All is documented in the 1 year of development in maillists. After Flow development reached a milestone, people started to comment about the pros and cons of using Javascript. Here is a interesting mail of these times (from Stefano): http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=105284906231855&w=2 The full thread is here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105275829100006&r=1&w=2 </comment> Now we have a year of Flow in Cocoon and based on our experience with Flow it is time to think how to improve it. I am not sure if Java is the best. Sometimes I will like to have the power of the eclipse IDE to debug my show flows, but .... In short I think this is a very interesting discusion that for sure will bring Flow to the next level. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
