Ugo Cei wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > I think we have the second problem in Cocoon since our > first version > > :( I always thought about adding a counter for the > concurrent requests > > in a tree processor, but always forget about it :( Regarding > > performance: is this a problem as the counter has to be > synchronized? > > Whay? If the counter is a simple "int" field, you don't need > to synchronize access to it, or I am missing something? > Sure, but it's somehow synchronized of course internally. Now I think to remember a problem in Cocoon.java where we counted all active requests. I think we changed this because of performance to only count if debug logging is turned on. That's why I thought about this problem. But perhaps I suffer from a weak memory :)
Carsten
