Re: [RT] Virtual Sitemap Components

[Ralph Goers]

I must admit, I am completely confused.  The question was posed earlier as 
to what the difference between virtual sitemap components and resources 
are, to which I haven't seen an answer.

It would seem that they are close enough conceptually that having both of 
them is just going to confuse users even more. Cannot resources be fixed to 
get rid of some of the shortcomings instead?

Ralph
At 7/16/2004  03:56 AM, you wrote:
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
There were some mentions in the past, that a VSC can contain any sitemap
component, so even actions, matchers and selectors are allowed in
the definition of the VSC.
So, first question is: do we want this?
(I would say: no)

I would say yes! Forbidding control structures in virtual components 
would greatly reduce their usefulness.

Totally agree with Sylvain here. Support for matchers/actions/selectors in 
virtual components is a must. Otherwise, current implementation of 
resource (with ratified bug) will be more useful than virtual components.

Vadim