Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 18 October 2004 15:14, Ugo Cei wrote:
Really? My understanding of this is that the issue is still open:
"As FSF has not yet clarified/answered questions with regard to this, nor has the LGPL been updated to clarify such - the murkyness around this makes us do the 'safe' thing; which is to avoid it for the time beeing."
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Licensing
I haven't checked the 'freshness' of those comments, but
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.poi.devel/5900
seems to give closure, at least until it reaches the courts.
That is ACO's interpretation of somebody's comment from the FSF, neither the ASF nor the FSF came to a resolution about it.
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
