Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
But the Dreamweaver usecase is a valid one (It was me who started a
discussion about this in May after attenting a Tapestry seminar at a
conference) and so we should support it.
Now, having them cohexist in the page smells like FS, though ;-)
Can't agree more.
What would you do then if you started simple (with attributes) and
found out after a while (when the template is already quite big) that
you need a tag syntax in some places?
Aren't they completly equivalent?
Yes they are (will/would be). Thing is you do not want them to coexist
in a single template.
--
Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
