On Mie, 5 de Enero de 2005, 14:14, Peter Hunsberger dijo: > On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:06:14 +0100, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > <snip>other loggers</snip> >> >> > and it looks like -1 on UGLI from Torsten. >> >> Well, I doubt I have to give a -1 with >> the given facts... :-P > > What's to stop everyone from continuing to just construct the Strings > like they do today and not use the UGLI parameter substitution? Isn't > the fact that it can do substitution on up to two parameters just the > equivalent of some extra convenience methods? Or is there something > else I missed?
Because UGLI allows only 2 parameters substitutions (you cannot substitute 3 parameters). And this is not a big deal. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
