What's to stop everyone from continuing to just construct the Strings like they do today and not use the UGLI parameter substitution?
What's the bonus of switching then? Maybe we need some more input on UGLI.
Isn't the fact that it can do substitution on up to two parameters just the equivalent of some extra convenience methods? Or is there something else I missed?
Well, convenience ...hm ...I am no big fan of mixing concepts
Because UGLI allows only 2 parameters substitutions (you cannot substitute 3 parameters). And this is not a big deal.
Not a big deal? ...at least for me it would rule out that approach.
cheers -- Torsten
