IMO it is an esential service for our users that we in a honest and realistic way tell what we actually, in practicem, with real work, support rather than what we whish we supported.
And I think nobody disagrees with that. Status page (suggested somewhere up the thread) indicating the status of the block, some additional information about the block, etc, will accomplish this even with flat directory structure in SVN.
What exactly changing directory structure buys you? If there is clear and structured documentation about the blocks (it can use structure like supported/unsupported/contributed/abandoned/whatever) and similarly structured hierarchy in the sample webapp, what, on top of this, directory structure in SVN gives?
I'm not so against moving stuff, but I'm just trying to understand why to move.
Vadim
