Ralph Goers wrote: > > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > >>If there is *high* community interest in hosting it at Apache I'm willing to >>move. In fact, lack of a community was one of the main reasons in >>creating Cowarp outside of Apache. >> > > I have no idea how to become part of a community at sourceforge. Most > seem to have no mailing list activity. I've not set up mailing lists yet, but could if required. Apart from that, I don't see a real difference here: you have a repository, a mailing list, a forum, you can add committers to the project etc.
> I do know that many folks are > confused by our current authentication framework. I suspect that is why > interest in it isn't higher. I happen to use it, but it is a little > clunky. However, I've also considered looking into other authentication > frameworks. > > >>Another advantage is that I can use Maven for building Cowarp - >>something our build system does not provide. But for me using Maven is >>another prerequisite :) >> > > Well, I vastly prefer maven as well, but I'm not sure why it is required. Ok, "required" is perhaps the wrong term - I'm currently using Maven and I'm enjoying it's features and I don't want to miss them. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
