Jason Johnston wrote:
Mark Lundquist wrote:
On Nov 13, 2006, at 10:14 PM, Rice Yeh wrote:
Thank you. Will this patch go into the trunk eventually?
It's up to the committers. I'm sure they will take a look at it and
decide if they think it's a good way.
I can't vouch for the patch, but I'll definitely give my +1 on having
this feature. It's something I've wanted for a while, just never got
around to submitting a request.
Even though same can be achieved in flow itself, it probably is a good usability
feature so it worth adding it... WDYT?
Vadim
But if you want to try a trunk version, here it is. I couldn't get
trunk to build, so you might have to fix this if it doesn't compile :-/
cheers,
—ml—
==================================================================
---
blocks/cocoon-flowscript/cocoon-flowscript-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/flow/javascript/fom/FOM_JavaScriptInterpreter.java
(revision 474689)
+++
blocks/cocoon-flowscript/cocoon-flowscript-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/cocoon/components/flow/javascript/fom/FOM_JavaScriptInterpreter.java
(working copy)
@@ -593,11 +593,19 @@
}
cocoon.setParameters(parameters);
- Object fun =
ScriptableObject.getProperty(thrScope, funName);
- if (fun == Scriptable.NOT_FOUND) {
- throw new ResourceNotFoundException("Function
\"javascript:" + funName + "()\" not found");
+ // Resolve function name
+ //
+ Object fun;
+ try {
+ fun = context.compileString (funName, null,
1, null)
+ .exec (context, thrScope);
+ } catch (EcmaError ee) {
+ throw new ResourceNotFoundException (
+ "Function \"javascript:" + funName +
"()\" not found"
+ );
}
- Re: call a function not in global object in <map:call &... Vadim Gritsenko
-