On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > :-( that's bad. Any other suggestions?
I still think that Cocoon 3.0 could be the name, if people are going to invest a significant effort in what's Corona today. For Sling we'd like to use the pipelines implementation, so some of us Sling folks are planning to contribute and help maintain that. I am not interested in the other parts at the moment. We already have 2.1 and 2.2 which are fairly different products, Cocoon 3.0 would be a lightweight embeddable thing that captures the essence of Cocoon in a way that's better suited to many of today's environments. Clearly an evolution, even though some parts will be missing, as those new environments provide them. -Bertrand
