On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Reinhard Pötz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...I'm still not convinced that we should name it Cocoon 3.0 _now_ (quoting > myself from a few days ago):.. I knew someone had said something about that, couldn't find that thread ;-) > ...When Corona is able to attract a stable community proves itself useable to > a > wider audience, we can start to ship it as Cocoon 3.0.... If that's the plan (and I like it), why not keep the "project Corona" name for now? That would be just a project name, not a product name, so we don't need to care about conflicts, the full name would be "Apache Cocoon - project Corona". -Bertrand
