On 01/12/23 18:24, Cédric Damioli wrote:
Le 01/12/2023 à 17:41, Cédric Damioli a écrit :
We'd like to know whether you'd prefer:
[ ] retiring Cocoon 3.0
[ ] reviving/maintaining Cocoon 3.0, meaning that you volunteer to be somehow 
involved

I'd vote +1 for retiring Cocoon 3.0, as during the past 10+ years, I had seen 
no thread, no questions about it.
I personally have never tried it.

Cocoon 3.0 has been my first "serious" approach to The ASF and also where I 
earned committership and PMC membership.

I am not pleased to admin that, but I think it is time to let it go: while its 
ground ideas were incredibly neat at the time, they never turned into 
mainstream, regrettably.

It has been even used by Syncope until 3.0.0-M0 [1] around Q4 2022.

Regards.

[1] https://github.com/apache/syncope/blob/syncope-3.0.0-M0/pom.xml#L1167-L1176

--
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/

Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

Reply via email to