Sooo … who’s adding the resolution to the next board meeting’s agenda?
Chris Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> Datum: Samstag, 14. September 2024 um 11:01 An: dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org> Betreff: AW: AW: [RESULT] [VOTE] Move Apache Cocoon into the Apache Attic Well, I guess this is sort of the issue we are facing here. There are some people that like and still use cocoon and would like others to clean up stuff. But so far, I have not really heard anyone actually willing to do the work. If there’s nobody willing to do the work, then the project can’t continue. That’s as simple as it can get. I did the work to clean up the build, to make building releasing etc. simpler in the hope that would re-engage people, but it seems that did not work. I thought I had heard from one of the PMC members that he also maintains a private fork. But that might have been me mixing up things. Chris Von: insigh...@gmail.com <insigh...@gmail.com> Datum: Freitag, 13. September 2024 um 17:46 An: dev@cocoon.apache.org <dev@cocoon.apache.org> Betreff: Re: AW: [RESULT] [VOTE] Move Apache Cocoon into the Apache Attic Dspace (prior to version 7) used Cocoon 2.2, and enhanced its functionality, for instance, integration with Lucene SOLR. Look for the XMLUI section available from: https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/releases/tag/dspace-6.4 Release Notes: https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/DSDOC6x I always continued to use Cocoon version 2.1x, and am hoping to use LLMs to help me refactor some of its code. I am not a JAVA developer. There were a few old code samples many (many years) ago adding some java classes, which I believe were never fully integrated into 2.13. I still love 2.1x, and would like to see better html parser cleanup than jsoup/niko, hardening security issues, and wow, if the python integrator package could ever be upgraded, that would tie in nicely with the wide use of python language. Cocoon pipelines are awesome. Dan ======================== On 2024-09-13 8:15 a.m., Cédric Damioli wrote: Do you think there exist "multiple" forks ? I'm now aware of Gabriel's but are there any others ? Cédric Le 13/09/2024 à 15:58, Christofer Dutz a écrit : It does seem as if multiple people claimed to still be using Cocoon, but maintaining their own forks. Why not bring exactly this back to the upstream project and join forces in maintaining it? Chris Von: Cédric Damioli <cdami...@apache.org><mailto:cdami...@apache.org> Datum: Donnerstag, 12. September 2024 um 19:31 An: dev@cocoon.apache.org<mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org> <dev@cocoon.apache.org><mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org> Betreff: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Move Apache Cocoon into the Apache Attic Hi, Sadly, there's not enough motivated individuals to keep the project running as is. When we ran a poll 10 months ago, very few people actually volunteered to help keeping Cocoon 2.3 alive, and the reality of these past 10 months is that nobody has barely done anything to move forward. Anyway, now that the Attic vote has passed, we have to move forward with the due process. Cédric Le 11/09/2024 à 13:27, Gabriel Gruber a écrit : >> Can you explain why you didn't via https://github.com/apache/cocoon ? Hmm, good question actually. I wasn’t aware that the PR functionality was actually really used to add enhancements to the project and I always felt a little bit lost with the formal/administrative rules to get patches to the project, without being an official committer. Anyway I would be willing to add all necessary changes to make cocoon compatible with spring 5+ in a PR Cheerio, Gabriel From: Torsten Curdt <tcu...@apache.org><mailto:tcu...@apache.org> Date: Wednesday, 11. September 2024 at 10:59 To: dev@cocoon.apache.org<mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org> <dev@cocoon.apache.org><mailto:dev@cocoon.apache.org> Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Move Apache Cocoon into the Apache Attic It is sad, to let such a powerful project die. Having said that, we are using it still in production and trying to apply security patches on our own fork to make it compatible with newer versions of spring and java. If the project would continue on github, I can just stress again that I would be very happy to participate and share all our patches. Can you explain why you didn't via https://github.com/apache/cocoon ? Just trying to understand whether github would really make a difference. While I am still +1 for the attic (because I don't see anyone working on Cocoon in any form), it feels a little sad if there are individually maintained forks that could as well be part of the project. cheers, Torsten