On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Commons rule is (or at least was) that Commons components should have > "boring functional names", so Commons Expression would fit, but Commons > Expresso would not. (Yes, there are some components that do not conform, but > they existed prior to the instigation of the rule.) >
No big deal. What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet! Ooooh! I've got it! How about comons-rose? ;) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
