Bill Barker a écrit : > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> > To: "Commons Developers List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 1:01 PM > Subject: Re: [math] Re: commons-math, matrix-toolkits-java and > consolidation > > >> +1 on this change. Grand names like SparseRealMatrix should be >> reserved for >> the interfaces. >> > > I'm +1 on these grounds (and, yes, that means I'm volunteering to do the > work). I could add the getSparcity method as well (the only one that is > useful for 2.0). Could do the getShape which would presumably return an > enum (which would only have one element in 2.0) to ease the pain of > upgrading to 2.1 when there are more.
Sounds good, I'll let you handle this and focus on my very late stiff ODE handling. Anyone volunteering for the return values of multiply, add and similar methods on RealMatrixImpl, DenseRealMatrix, ... ? Thanks, Luc > > > >> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Luc Maisonobe >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> > - rename SparseReal{Matrix, Vector} to OpenMapRealSparse{Matrix, > >>> Vector}. >>> > Implement above interfaces. >>> >>> I have no opinion on that. What do others think ? >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ted Dunning, CTO >> DeepDyve >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
