The output of f2j is almost unusable for normal mortals. There will definitely be a wrapper layer.
Also, there is more than a wrapper in MTJ. There are also higher order algorithms that use the lower level linear algebra provided by f2j. On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Jin Mingjian <jin....@gmail.com> wrote: > Can I ask a question? how about MTJ vs pure F2J? (If I don't use the native > part of MTJ.) > Can I get more must-have things? is it necessary to introduce a wrapper > layer? > Best regards, > Jin > -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve
