On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:48 PM, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > AIUI, the GA tag is created before the vote. If the vote fails, the > tag has to be deleted and recreated for the next vote. I.e. the tag is > not enough to identify the source of what was voted on.
I agree with you that *release* tags are important and should be kept. I won't bother too much with tags that have been rejected. > Whereas if one uses a tag with RCn in the name, one can create RC1, > RC2, RC3 etc if the votes fail; whichever RCn succeeds can then be > copied to the GA tag, which is therefore not changed once created. And what prevents you to rename release => RC1, release => RC2, and so on, unto a successful vote? (Not that I'd request that, but it sounds like a good compromise.) Jochen -- Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
