On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> > On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > >wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> I would say that is up to the RM :) > > Did you add the above comment? It wasn't in my original email. > > Yes. Definitely up to the RM, IMO. > > > > I personally don't have a problem with the out-of-synch condition. What > is > > important is, like changes.xml or any other file, what gets tagged and > > released. > > Well, this creates a problem. I don't want to do the manual step as the > release should consist of "mvn release:prepare release:perform". I can > easily add the release notes to the zip but they won't be in svn since they > are generated to the target directory and then copied into the zip by the > assembly plugin. I've thought about putting them into a META-INF directory > to indicate that they were generated. > > Ralph > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
