On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:48 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 22 December 2010 00:11, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:55 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >> > On 21 December 2010 05:21, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> >> wrote
> >> >
> >> >> I have not included release notes in the src zip since my
> understanding
> >> is the src zip should contain the directories pretty much as they exist
> in
> >> SVN.  Instead I have added a README.txt that tells a user how to
> generate
> >> the announcement file.
> >> >
> >> > I would prefer to see the release notes generated and checked into
> >> > SVN; they can then be included in both source and binary archives.
> >> >
> >> > See for example MATH and NET (2.0)
> >>
> >> I looked at net/trunk. I would prefer that the release notes be
> generated
> >> during mvn release:prepare instead of requiring a manual mvn invocation
> to
> >> create the release notes and then a commit. I have that working for the
> >> binary distribution but I don't want to do it for the source
> distribution
> >> since they shouldn't be included if they aren't in svn and, in my view,
> they
> >> shouldn't be in svn because they will generally be out of sync with
> >> changes.xml in trunk.
> >>
> >> I would say that is up to the RM :)
> >
> > I personally don't have a problem with the out-of-synch condition.  What
> is
> > important is, like changes.xml or any other file, what gets tagged and
> > released.
>
> +1
>
> I think it's vital that the release notes are included in the source
> release.
>
> The user should not be required to run a command to create the release
> notes.
>
> But the RM should definitely *look at* the generated release notes and,
IMO, intentionally committing them is a good thing.  Nothing generated
directly from maven has ever met my expectations in terms of formatting and
content, so I have always ended up tweaking the generated files.  I don't
see this as onerous, personally.

Phil


> > Phil
> >
> >
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to