Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]? Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer Rocket Software 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA Tel: +1.404.760.1560 Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:p...@hoplahup.net] > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 15:49 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [lang] math expression parser > > Well... I never thought about such.... but maybe it's indeed useful. > Something short and tiny that is a lot more compact than the java syntax for > math but would have about the same capabilities. > > I am not used to commit to lang so we'll have to wait for them to answer. > > I find the classname PostfixExpression pretty bizarre... should it be simply > MathExpressionParser ? > > paul > > > Le 5 janv. 2011 à 21:18, frank asseg a écrit : > > > Hola Ted, > > > > On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote: > >> Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? > > sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure > > mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and > > the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate > > thigs like "log(2)^2.4" at runtime. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
