On Jan 5, 2011, at 18:05, "Stephen Colebourne" <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
> I would recommend against this for [lang]. > > [lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or > "religious" aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements > that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, however useful, > isn't that closely related IMO. +1 Gary > > Stephen > > > On 5 January 2011 20:18, frank asseg <frank.as...@congrace.de> wrote: >> Hola Ted, >> >> On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote: >>> Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? >> sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure >> mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and >> the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate >> thigs like "log(2)^2.4" at runtime. >> >> Have fun! >> >> -- >> *frank asseg* >> softwareentwicklung >> sebastian-kneipp-strasse 14a >> 79104 freiburg i. brsg. >> tel.: ++49-761-88790001 >> fax.: ++49-761-88790002 >> mail: frank.as...@congrace.de >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
